Comparative performance of biofire pneumonia panel and standard culture-based methods for diagnosing pneumonia in critically ill patients: Impact on antibiotic stewardship

dc.contributor.authorBarnali Kakati
dc.contributor.authorRajender Singh
dc.contributor.authorGarima Mittal
dc.contributor.authorNupur Koul
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-27T09:46:26Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-22
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Accurate identification of the pathogens causing LRTIs is crucial for ensuring of diagnostic and antibiotic stewardship. The Biofire Pneumonia Panel (BFPP) is a molecular diagnostic test that allows rapid detection of various bacterial and viral pathogens. In this study, we compared the performance of BFPP with standard culture methods for the detection of pathogens. Materials and methods: Respiratory samples from 70 patient with suspected LRTIs were tested using both BFPP and standard culture methods. The distribution of isolated bacterial pathogens was analyzed, and the sensitivity and specificity of BFPP were calculated. Additionally, the performance of BFPP in detecting antimicrobial resistance genes was evaluated. The results were compared with those obtained from VITEK-2 antimicrobial susceptibility testing and culture-based methods. Results: Among the suspected LRTI cases, BFPP identified a single pathogen in 32.8% of cases and multiple pathogens in 40% of cases. The standard culture method detected a single pathogen in 47.1% of cases. BFPP showed a sensitivity of 93.9% and a specificity of 45.9% for the total sample. The performance of BFPP in detecting antimicrobial resistance genes varied for different pathogens with overall sensitivity of 40.1% and specificity of 95.9%. Conclusion: The Biofire Pneumonia Panel (BFPP) demonstrated high sensitivity for several bacterial pathogens, indicating its potential as a rapid diagnostic tool. However, its performance varied for different microorganisms, and it had limitations in detecting certain pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes for which still required more further studies to explore different resistance gene mechanism that can be incorporated in this panel in future. The BFPP can complement standard culture methods as a rapid tool in the diagnosis of LRTIs
dc.identifier.citationBarnali Kakati, Rajender Singh, Garima Mittal, Nupur Koul, Comparative performance of biofire pneumonia panel and standard culture-based methods for diagnosing pneumonia in critically ill patients: Impact on antibiotic stewardship, Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, Volume 49, 2024, 100564, ISSN 0255-0857, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100564.
dc.identifier.issn1998-3646
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.0.2.71:4000/handle/123456789/294
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectBiofire peumonia panel
dc.subjectStandard culture methods
dc.subjectPneumonia
dc.subjectDiagnostic stewardship
dc.titleComparative performance of biofire pneumonia panel and standard culture-based methods for diagnosing pneumonia in critically ill patients: Impact on antibiotic stewardship
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
1-s2.0-S0255085724000392-main.pdf
Size:
2.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: