Comparative performance of biofire pneumonia panel and standard culture-based methods for diagnosing pneumonia in critically ill patients: Impact on antibiotic stewardship
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024-04-22
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Abstract
Introduction: Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Accurate identification of the pathogens causing LRTIs is crucial for ensuring of diagnostic and antibiotic
stewardship. The Biofire Pneumonia Panel (BFPP) is a molecular diagnostic test that allows rapid detection of
various bacterial and viral pathogens. In this study, we compared the performance of BFPP with standard culture
methods for the detection of pathogens.
Materials and methods: Respiratory samples from 70 patient with suspected LRTIs were tested using both BFPP
and standard culture methods. The distribution of isolated bacterial pathogens was analyzed, and the sensitivity
and specificity of BFPP were calculated. Additionally, the performance of BFPP in detecting antimicrobial
resistance genes was evaluated. The results were compared with those obtained from VITEK-2 antimicrobial
susceptibility testing and culture-based methods.
Results: Among the suspected LRTI cases, BFPP identified a single pathogen in 32.8% of cases and multiple
pathogens in 40% of cases. The standard culture method detected a single pathogen in 47.1% of cases. BFPP
showed a sensitivity of 93.9% and a specificity of 45.9% for the total sample. The performance of BFPP in
detecting antimicrobial resistance genes varied for different pathogens with overall sensitivity of 40.1% and
specificity of 95.9%.
Conclusion: The Biofire Pneumonia Panel (BFPP) demonstrated high sensitivity for several bacterial pathogens,
indicating its potential as a rapid diagnostic tool. However, its performance varied for different microorganisms,
and it had limitations in detecting certain pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes for which still required
more further studies to explore different resistance gene mechanism that can be incorporated in this panel in
future. The BFPP can complement standard culture methods as a rapid tool in the diagnosis of LRTIs
Description
Keywords
Biofire peumonia panel, Standard culture methods, Pneumonia, Diagnostic stewardship
Citation
Barnali Kakati, Rajender Singh, Garima Mittal, Nupur Koul, Comparative performance of biofire pneumonia panel and standard culture-based methods for diagnosing pneumonia in critically ill patients: Impact on antibiotic stewardship, Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, Volume 49, 2024, 100564, ISSN 0255-0857, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmmb.2024.100564.
